Page Summary
yohkobennington.livejournal.com - (no subject)
geckoholic - (no subject)
quickreaver.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tifaching.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nanoks.livejournal.com - (no subject)
marciaelena.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dolnmoon.livejournal.com - (no subject)
reapertownusa.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: From barn to bridge - Now it's perfect...
- 2: A unexpected arty gift!
- 3: New writing community!
- 4: SPN Eldritch Reverse Bang - The Masks We Wear
- 5: Art for WIPBang. DCU - Refugia
- 6: Wincest BB Art Masterpost - Let Your Colours Bleed...
- 7: Arty post - Drawtober & other things
- 8: The marvellous Katy Chen - art
- 9: Drawesome challenge #67 - Stained Glass
Style Credit
- Base style: Crossroads by
- Theme: Altair by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags


no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 09:41 pm (UTC)....But it's like using tracing paper, isn't it?
no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 09:48 pm (UTC)I've always encouraged a combination of photoreferencing and pulling from your imagination. You'll get a lot of accuracy using photos (sometimes to the exclusion of creativity), but your innate style shines through more endearingly when you don't use the photo as a crutch. And sometimes there's photographic distortion that can be copied by accident, which can make anatomy and perspective look wonky. That's when you have to put the photo aside and trust your own eye.
All this being said, I love your lines! And if you're having fun? That's more than half the battle!
no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 10:04 pm (UTC)That being said, I did used to trace sometimes, and thought my freehand drawing improved afterwards - something to do with training the hand and eye to look for the right proportions, maybe?
I guess I get frustrated with my 'endearing' quirks as they feel too much like inaccuracies!! (Though I am happy to see other people drawing endearingly - I like it a lot when other people do it!)
no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 10:35 pm (UTC)~Maxfield Parrish
~Norman Rockwell
~Donato Giancola
~Picasso
~Degas
~Mucha
There's a saying: "An artist's style is not about what they do best, it's about their mistakes." Or something like that. Work back and forth, just as you're doing! Do photostudies, then try to draw from imagination or w/o tracing. You don't have to show the ones you don't like to the world, but it all contributes to PROGRESS. :D
no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 10:48 pm (UTC)Anywho, thanks for all the cheerleading; I aim to continue misbehaving!
no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-10 11:59 pm (UTC)Stunning job, sweetie!!!
no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 09:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 09:12 am (UTC)And thanks a lot :D
no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 09:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 09:19 am (UTC)This looks like a piece done with a grid, which isn't uncommon, especially in portrait art. My style preference is for realism and I was taught to do portraits via grids, which is what I still do. As long as you're using the original photo(s) just to get the correct proportions, paint overs like the gorgeous example you have here aren't fundamentally any different than the grid technique and are definitely still fully valid as art.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-11 09:32 am (UTC)My style preference is realism too (and yes, I get frustrated drawing freehand when I can't get something as realistic as I want it)
What I did with this one was had the photo as my original layer, did a sketch outline of the face and areas of shading (which I'd darkened on the original photo to increase the contrast) then got rid of the photo layer and drew/shaded from there just using the photo as reference. So I don't know if that is a digital 'paint over' or not really.